Eugeny E. Zharin

Attorney-at-law (reg. 50/4481 in register of attorneys of Moscow Region)

Tel. (495) 223-9170
Mob. (925) 859-5284
e-mail: evgeni-advokat@mail.ru

Legal experience more than 20 years.

Education:
Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, specialty - law, qualification-lawyer.

Professional skills:
• law enforcement background;
• management of legal departments of multi-profile and holding companies;
• organization of claim-related work of the company;
• drafting and analyzing of various contracts;
• legal services for the companies;
• organization and support of foreign economic activities of organizations;
• arbitration and civil disputes;
• customs disputes and crimes;
• tax offenses and crimes;
• support of foreign economic and commercial activities;
• corporate dispute;
• economic crimes;
• disputes about real estate and non-fulfillment of obligations by contractors.

Have experienced in:
• participation in arbitration and in courts of Common law of different instances;
• protection of suspects and accused at the investigation stage and in the court.

Most significant cases:
• evasion of customs duties during deliveries for the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Goznak": the case was reclassified and terminated due to the expiration of the Statute of limitations for criminal prosecution.
• 19 episodes of smuggling on a particularly large scale: the measure of restraint in the form of detention was changed, the case was dismissed due to the lack of corpus delicti.
• fraud and abuse of power by a police officer: termination of the criminal case, after two sessions of the Moscow city court Presidium and the Judicial Board for criminal cases of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation the criminal case was dismissed.
• theft of gas: cancellation of the sentence by the Presidium of the Moscow Regional Court and termination of the criminal case.
• land dispute with one of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise of the Ministry of defense of the Russian Federation: the settlement agreement was signed that actually reproduces our claims.
• dispute with the Government of Moscow about the termination of the contract for the purchase of real estate at an electronic auction: the claim is satisfied.
• a claim from third parties to the administration of one of the districts of the Moscow region to invalidate the contract of sale of a land plot together with a local road: the claim is satisfied.
• refusal to provide accommodation for a disabled child: the claim is satisfied, the apartment is provided.